Ian Ayres, Super-Crunchers: Why Thinking-By-Numbers is the New Way to be Smart (Bantam 2007) at 112, explains that “The human mind tends to suffer from a number of well-documented cognitive failings and biases that distort our ability to predict accurately.” Ayres gives three examples, each of which crops up in-house.…
Articles Posted in Thinking
Exercise jogs a lawyer’s brain
To upgrade the mental capabilities of in-house counsel, encourage them to sweat. A fast-beating heart is a high RPM brain. Exercise “improves the blood’s access to specific brain regions and stimulates learning cells to make brain-derived neurotrophic factor, or BDNF, which acts like cerebral Miracle-Gro for neurons.” Personally, I sprinkle…
In vino veritas: the neurological rush from paying expensive law firms
Some research suggests that our bias toward higher-priced goods may have something to do with the way our brains link price with pleasure — and thus leads people to make assumptions about expensiveness signaling quality. If it’s pricey it must be premium. A column in the NY Times, Feb. 9,…
An abundance of posts on decisions, and guidelines for how to decide on the ones you want
You would have a hard time deciding among all the posts on this blog about decisions. A number of them step back from specific tools and techniques to broader aspects of in-house decision-making (See my posts of Aug. 24, 2006: multiple facets of in-house decisions; March 6, 2006: six generic…
Managers should ponder the direction and reality of cause and effect when they make decisions
It is fascinating to mull over what causes what. A few comments on this blog have adverted to cause and effect (See my posts of Nov. 11, 2007 on four contexts that vary by cause and effect; May 14, 2005 on “proof by anecdote”; and Jan. 1, 2008 on agency…
Why lawyers sometimes balk at being told what to do – psychological reactance
For years, psychologists have studied and confirmed the familiar phenomenon of so-called psychological reactance. An article in Cal. Mgt. Rev., Vol. 50, Fall 2007 at 164, about gender stereotypes in negotiation defines that phenomenon as “the heightened desire people feel to assert their freedom when they perceive it is being…
Drawbacks of meetings as a method to aggregate reliable information
An article in Cal. Mgt. Rev., Vol. 50, Fall 2007 at 146, does a good job of explaining prediction markets, which in part are a way to aggregate information (See my posts of Feb. 16, 2006 on collective prediction markets; Sept. 13, 2005 on an early version of this; Dec.…
The power of peer influence in a law department
We are all very susceptible to the actions of our peers when it comes to making a decision. This idea comes from Sloan Mgt. Rev., Vol. 49, Winter 2008 at 84, where an article gives many examples of the powerful influence on us of our colleagues’ actions. Actually, the point…
Collected firings on the brains of “cognitive lawyers”
My initial forays were in 2006 (See my post of Feb. 15, 2006 with 15 references in nine categories; and May 30, 2006 and three references cited.). Since then many more posts have set out ideas about how our brains operate and the consequences for lawyers. A few blog posts…
The cartography of law departments – descriptions at different scales
An author in Historically Speaking, Vol. 8, May/June 2007 at 15, wrestling with notions of complexity in history (See my post of Jan. 1, 2007 for a related comment.), offers the metaphor of maps. “Just as mapping can be carried out at many scales from the local to the global,…