Close

Articles Posted in Thinking

Updated:

Three reasons why lawyers, being human, are bad at making predictions

Ian Ayres, Super-Crunchers: Why Thinking-By-Numbers is the New Way to be Smart (Bantam 2007) at 112, explains that “The human mind tends to suffer from a number of well-documented cognitive failings and biases that distort our ability to predict accurately.” Ayres gives three examples, each of which crops up in-house.…

Updated:

Exercise jogs a lawyer’s brain

To upgrade the mental capabilities of in-house counsel, encourage them to sweat. A fast-beating heart is a high RPM brain. Exercise “improves the blood’s access to specific brain regions and stimulates learning cells to make brain-derived neurotrophic factor, or BDNF, which acts like cerebral Miracle-Gro for neurons.” Personally, I sprinkle…

Updated:

An abundance of posts on decisions, and guidelines for how to decide on the ones you want

You would have a hard time deciding among all the posts on this blog about decisions. A number of them step back from specific tools and techniques to broader aspects of in-house decision-making (See my posts of Aug. 24, 2006: multiple facets of in-house decisions; March 6, 2006: six generic…

Updated:

Why lawyers sometimes balk at being told what to do – psychological reactance

For years, psychologists have studied and confirmed the familiar phenomenon of so-called psychological reactance. An article in Cal. Mgt. Rev., Vol. 50, Fall 2007 at 164, about gender stereotypes in negotiation defines that phenomenon as “the heightened desire people feel to assert their freedom when they perceive it is being…