Close

Articles Posted in Benchmarks

Updated:

My article on the esoterica of power-law distributions (exponential indices, anyone?)

Power-law distributions rarely crop up in lunchrooms and hallways. Lawyers often feel uncomfortable with mathematics, let alone something as esoteric as a function with an exponent. But reluctance and distaste does not change the fact that a number of occurrences that happen in legal departments have the frequency structure described…

Updated:

Total legal spending as a percentage of revenues has remained relatively constant over past five years

Total legal spending as a percentage of revenue (TLS/Rev) leads the metrics pack in terms of importance (See my post of Dec. 5, 2007: stability of the ratio over a decade; and Jan. 12, 2009: benchmarks over time with 8 references.). https://www.lawdepartmentmanagementblog.com/median-benchmarks-for-comparables-stay-quite-stable-over-periods-of-five-or-more-years/ Longitudinal data from a law department benchmark survey…

Updated:

Differences between benchmark comparisons on industry, revenue, and number of lawyers

A recent post describes a multi-column chart that color codes a law department’s metrics against key benchmarks (See my post of Sept. 22, 2009: three comparisons on nine benchmarks.). It reminded me that I have long felt the most meaningful benchmark comparisons to be with companies in the same industry.…

Updated:

A clever chart that shows your department on three comparisons as to nine benchmarks

During a recent consultation, I reviewed a chart that covered metrics for nine basic benchmarks. The chart had five columns, the first being the metric, such as outside legal spending per lawyer. The next column was 1st quartile, then 2nd quartile, 3rd quartile and 4th quartile. The legal department had…

Updated:

One-third splits are predictable when you ask a group of GCs any question about the future

The Intellectual Property Owners Association (in a report issued in May 2009) asked its members about the number of applications for new U.S. patents they foresaw in 2009. Are you surprised that 29 percent thought they would increase, 41 percent thought they would decline, and 30 percent thought the number…